"Big When I Was Little" by Eliza Doolittle is a song that I currently hear every day on the two radio stations I listen to; the song was officially released in the United Kingdom in the past couple of days:
I have written about Doolittle before: one of my earliest posts was to write about her 2010 hit single "Pack Up"; "Pack Up" is also among the first songs I ever heard when I returned to the United Kingdom. As such, I'm pleased to hear another song of hers on the radio; I love her voice and her fun music.
Tuesday, 30 July 2013
Monday, 29 July 2013
The toad
Late last night, my brother spotted this toad on the concrete at the back of our house:
This is most definitely a toad: toads have dry, bumpy skin and they crawl whereas frogs have moist, smooth skin and they hop. This toad allowed me to photograph it; it didn't seem to be in any hurry to get away from me and my brother.
This is most definitely a toad: toads have dry, bumpy skin and they crawl whereas frogs have moist, smooth skin and they hop. This toad allowed me to photograph it; it didn't seem to be in any hurry to get away from me and my brother.
Sunday, 28 July 2013
1945 Empire State Building plane crash
Today is the 68th anniversary of when a B-25 Mitchell bomber crashed into the Empire State Building in New York City. Unlike the attacks of September 11th 2001, this plane crash was entirely accidental: the plane's pilot, Lieutenant Colonel William Franklin Smith, Jr., had been flying from Bedford Army Air Field to La Guardia Airport; however, when Smith came in range of La Guardia, he asked for a weather report in Newark and opted to land there. Smith was advised that there was zero visibility, but he continued regardless; when he flew over Manhattan, the fog disoriented him, causing him to make an incorrect turn near the Chrysler Building.
That wrong turn led him, his plane and his crew into the Empire State Building; the aircraft struck the 79th floor on the north side of the skyscraper. While the overall structural integrity of the Empire State Building remained intact, the crash killed 14 people, including Smith and his two other crewmen, and started a fire that took well over half an hour to extinguish; the fire was the highest in the city's history until September 11th, 2001, but retains the record of being the highest building fire to be controlled. Despite the deaths and the damage inflicted upon the Empire State Building, the tower was open again two days later; the cost of the repairs was around $1,000,000, which is estimated at $13,000,000 by today's standards.
Betty Lou Oliver was the other notable person of the day. She had been working on the 80th floor when the building was struck; she received burns but she survived. When rescue units arrived at her location, they decided to send her back down the building via an elevator; however, the crash had weakened the cable, and when the doors closed the elevator fell. Oliver was fortunate a second time, as rapid compression of air in the shaft slowed the elevator's descent and the thousand feet of elevator cable that had fallen to the bottom cushioned the landing. To this day, Oliver holds the record for the highest-survived elevator fall.
Sadly, the accident is often overshadowed by 9/11; worse yet, it's cited by some conspiracy theorists attempting to rationalize their opinions about 9/11. They often argue that, because the Empire State Building, a structure from the early 1930s, survived a plane crash, then the World Trade Center towers should easily have survived, too. They forget that the Empire State Building was hit by a small and slow aircraft compared to the jets that hit the Twin Towers; the Twin Towers also had a radically different structural design to the Empire State Building. Beyond planes crashing into skyscrapers in New York City, the two incidents are hardly comparable. Even today, I read an informative article about the accident, but I mistakely read the comments section, which was brimming with trolling.
The events that transpired on July 28th, 1945, in New York City mustn't be forgotten; they might not have been as deadly or as destructive as 9/11, but they were a tragedy, all the same.
----
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Empire_State_Building_crash
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betty_Lou_Oliver
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/07/28/nyregion/flaming-horror-79th-floor-50-years-ago-today-fog-plane-hit-world-s-tallest.html?pagewanted=2&src=pm
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92987873
http://web.archive.org/web/20060317041607/http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=53746
That wrong turn led him, his plane and his crew into the Empire State Building; the aircraft struck the 79th floor on the north side of the skyscraper. While the overall structural integrity of the Empire State Building remained intact, the crash killed 14 people, including Smith and his two other crewmen, and started a fire that took well over half an hour to extinguish; the fire was the highest in the city's history until September 11th, 2001, but retains the record of being the highest building fire to be controlled. Despite the deaths and the damage inflicted upon the Empire State Building, the tower was open again two days later; the cost of the repairs was around $1,000,000, which is estimated at $13,000,000 by today's standards.
Betty Lou Oliver was the other notable person of the day. She had been working on the 80th floor when the building was struck; she received burns but she survived. When rescue units arrived at her location, they decided to send her back down the building via an elevator; however, the crash had weakened the cable, and when the doors closed the elevator fell. Oliver was fortunate a second time, as rapid compression of air in the shaft slowed the elevator's descent and the thousand feet of elevator cable that had fallen to the bottom cushioned the landing. To this day, Oliver holds the record for the highest-survived elevator fall.
Sadly, the accident is often overshadowed by 9/11; worse yet, it's cited by some conspiracy theorists attempting to rationalize their opinions about 9/11. They often argue that, because the Empire State Building, a structure from the early 1930s, survived a plane crash, then the World Trade Center towers should easily have survived, too. They forget that the Empire State Building was hit by a small and slow aircraft compared to the jets that hit the Twin Towers; the Twin Towers also had a radically different structural design to the Empire State Building. Beyond planes crashing into skyscrapers in New York City, the two incidents are hardly comparable. Even today, I read an informative article about the accident, but I mistakely read the comments section, which was brimming with trolling.
The events that transpired on July 28th, 1945, in New York City mustn't be forgotten; they might not have been as deadly or as destructive as 9/11, but they were a tragedy, all the same.
----
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Empire_State_Building_crash
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betty_Lou_Oliver
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/07/28/nyregion/flaming-horror-79th-floor-50-years-ago-today-fog-plane-hit-world-s-tallest.html?pagewanted=2&src=pm
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92987873
http://web.archive.org/web/20060317041607/http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=53746
Saturday, 27 July 2013
The friend zone redux
Two months ago, I wrote a piece on why I think the friend zone doesn't exist. I discovered the article Nice Guy Syndrome And The Friend Zone by Alisse Desrosiers; in particular, I agree with and would like to share the following paragraph from her piece, as it mostly sums up what I wrote about in my post:
"The Friend Zone is a bullshit, misogynistic, make-believe land Nice Guys have come up with to demonize women for not wanting to date them. They use it as an excuse to ignore the fact that there are Actual Reasons behind their decision to not pursue a relationship or have sex with this guy. You know, like not being physically attracted to them. Or not being able to connect with them. Or seeing through their crap and realizing that the only reason these guys are even friends with them in the first place is so they can get laid."
Not being attracted to someone and/or not being able to/not wanting to form a romantic connection with them are completely valid reasons for not dating a certain person; it happens to men and it happens to women. There is no "zone".
As for "Nice Guys", I am working on an article about them; I put it aside in favour of my article about the friend zone but I do intend to finish the piece and post it. Finally, I'd like to clarify that while I don't usually include profanity in my blog, I wasn't going to change any of Desrosiers' words when I posted the extract from her article; it would have been insulting to her and it's a fairly trivial concern when compared to the topic.
"The Friend Zone is a bullshit, misogynistic, make-believe land Nice Guys have come up with to demonize women for not wanting to date them. They use it as an excuse to ignore the fact that there are Actual Reasons behind their decision to not pursue a relationship or have sex with this guy. You know, like not being physically attracted to them. Or not being able to connect with them. Or seeing through their crap and realizing that the only reason these guys are even friends with them in the first place is so they can get laid."
Not being attracted to someone and/or not being able to/not wanting to form a romantic connection with them are completely valid reasons for not dating a certain person; it happens to men and it happens to women. There is no "zone".
As for "Nice Guys", I am working on an article about them; I put it aside in favour of my article about the friend zone but I do intend to finish the piece and post it. Finally, I'd like to clarify that while I don't usually include profanity in my blog, I wasn't going to change any of Desrosiers' words when I posted the extract from her article; it would have been insulting to her and it's a fairly trivial concern when compared to the topic.
Friday, 26 July 2013
The keyring
I was looking through some of my belongings this evening and saw this:
It's my Dish Network keyring. Dish Network was my family's satellite TV provider in Oregon for a few years until we decided to stop watching television and pay for satellite Internet instead (we got sick of dial-up). I've had this keyring for over ten years and I obtained the light from a Christmas cracker a few years ago.
An odd item to write about, definitely, but it's one I'm fond of; keyrings/fobs are often fun.
It's my Dish Network keyring. Dish Network was my family's satellite TV provider in Oregon for a few years until we decided to stop watching television and pay for satellite Internet instead (we got sick of dial-up). I've had this keyring for over ten years and I obtained the light from a Christmas cracker a few years ago.
An odd item to write about, definitely, but it's one I'm fond of; keyrings/fobs are often fun.
Thursday, 25 July 2013
Another pinkish sunset
There have been a few fires around our way in the past couple of days; while the fires are nasally unpleasant and contribute to pollution, they also help produce some pretty sunsets:
I can assure you that they are meant to be pictures of the sunset, not of the streetlight! The streetlight was merely in the way, not the object of the photographs.
I can assure you that they are meant to be pictures of the sunset, not of the streetlight! The streetlight was merely in the way, not the object of the photographs.
Wednesday, 24 July 2013
The clouds
The weather produced some fantastic cloud formations today:
I took this picture in the morning; it was shot out of one of our house's upper windows, but I aimed the camera at such an angle to give the appearance of actually being "in the sky" with the clouds. Do you think I pulled it off?
This was in the afternoon; I took this image on one of the bridges over the railroad. I love the fluffy clouds mixed with the deep blue sky.
I also took a few pictures of the evening clouds but the images were blurred, which I was deeply disappointed about.
I took this picture in the morning; it was shot out of one of our house's upper windows, but I aimed the camera at such an angle to give the appearance of actually being "in the sky" with the clouds. Do you think I pulled it off?
I also took a few pictures of the evening clouds but the images were blurred, which I was deeply disappointed about.
Tuesday, 23 July 2013
A slug
I don't usually post close-up pictures of slimy creatures, but my brother recently took this fine shot of a slug:
He made this capture with his phone; it's a good image, as you can see how black and shiny the slug is. My brother was pleased with the pictures he took of this slug; I hope that no one is too creeped out by it!
He made this capture with his phone; it's a good image, as you can see how black and shiny the slug is. My brother was pleased with the pictures he took of this slug; I hope that no one is too creeped out by it!
Monday, 22 July 2013
Android Easter egg
If you own an Android phone running version Gingerbread (2.3) or above, there is an Easter egg present in the software. If you go into your phone's settings, select "About phone", scroll down to "Android version", and then press multiple times on the version number, the Easter egg will appear, although what egg appears depends on which version you have.
On Gingerbread, the phone comes up with a zombie scene; on Honeycomb (3.0), a bee appears, which will display a bee sound in a text box if you press it; on Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0), the Android robot appears dressed in an ice cream sandwich and if you long-press him, an abundance of robots dressed in ice cream sandwiches will swim across the screen. Finally, on Jelly Bean (4.1), a jelly bean will appear in the middle of screen; long-pressing the bean will replace it with smaller beans, which can be flicked off the screen.
I love Easter eggs in software and it's neat that there is at least one in Android. To my knowledge, this works on any Android phone provided it's version 2.3/Gingerbread or above; I am not aware of any restrictions by region or carrier.
On Gingerbread, the phone comes up with a zombie scene; on Honeycomb (3.0), a bee appears, which will display a bee sound in a text box if you press it; on Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0), the Android robot appears dressed in an ice cream sandwich and if you long-press him, an abundance of robots dressed in ice cream sandwiches will swim across the screen. Finally, on Jelly Bean (4.1), a jelly bean will appear in the middle of screen; long-pressing the bean will replace it with smaller beans, which can be flicked off the screen.
I love Easter eggs in software and it's neat that there is at least one in Android. To my knowledge, this works on any Android phone provided it's version 2.3/Gingerbread or above; I am not aware of any restrictions by region or carrier.
Sunday, 21 July 2013
My "Recipes": Andrew's Pesto, Egg and Cheese Tortilla Wrap
It's been ages since the My "Recipes" series ended. Over a year and a half later, I have a new recipe to post: Andrew's Pesto, Egg and Cheese Tortilla Wrap; I came up with it at yesterday's lunch. The ingredients are:
On the tortilla, cut the hard-boiled egg into four or five slices and then cut those slices into quarters. Then add the pesto, mix it in with the egg pieces and then add the cheese, mixing it in, too. Wrap the tortilla up and then cook it in the microwave for a minute and a half. The result should be a delicious, easy-to-make wrap.
1 tortilla wrap
1 hard-boiled egg
2 teaspoons of pesto
2 tablespoons of grated/shredded cheese
a microwave
On the tortilla, cut the hard-boiled egg into four or five slices and then cut those slices into quarters. Then add the pesto, mix it in with the egg pieces and then add the cheese, mixing it in, too. Wrap the tortilla up and then cook it in the microwave for a minute and a half. The result should be a delicious, easy-to-make wrap.
I don't have any pictures, mainly because I wasn't expecting my lunch to be both simple and tasty enough to warrant sharing!
Saturday, 20 July 2013
"Ayshalak" - Elissa
When reading my friend and fellow blogger Jessica's blog earlier today, I saw that she had briefly mentioned the Lebanese singer Elissa, a performer of Arabic pop music. I've known about Elissa for year, as I came across her Wikipedia article in 2007; I re-discovered her a few years later either by randomly browsing YouTube one day or being
linked to her when looking up the music of Israeli pop singer Dana
International. Even though I can't understand Elissa's lyrics, I do like her voice and her music; I have her 2002 album, Ayshalak.
This is "Ayshalak" from Ayshalak:
I have Ayshalak because that was the Elissa album available on Amazon UK; I received it at Easter. Ayshalak is the first album I own that isn't sung in English; before owning a copy of Ayshalak, the only albums that I owned with significant amounts of another language to English were a couple of Shakira's, which contained Spanish tracks.
I'm quite pleased that Jessica mentioned Elissa; it's good to know another person who knows about her!
This is "Ayshalak" from Ayshalak:
I have Ayshalak because that was the Elissa album available on Amazon UK; I received it at Easter. Ayshalak is the first album I own that isn't sung in English; before owning a copy of Ayshalak, the only albums that I owned with significant amounts of another language to English were a couple of Shakira's, which contained Spanish tracks.
I'm quite pleased that Jessica mentioned Elissa; it's good to know another person who knows about her!
Friday, 19 July 2013
On e-book readers
I used to be opposed to e-book readers, as I had fallen into the trap of thinking that e-readers "didn't provide the same experience as reading a real book" and that they were "insulting to real books". I didn't think I'd ever have a use for an e-reader and continued to oppose them when I received one for Christmas a couple of years ago.
In the past year, my stance slowly softened; then, a few months ago, my Dad starting using an e-reader and loved it: it gave him the opportunity to read books more frequently again (many of our actual books are still packed away). Mum liked Dad's e-reader and she received one for her birthday. This encouraged me to take a new look at my e-reader.
I haven't been using it long, but I have to say that I do love my e-reader: I, too, can read books more often again and I like how the device's screen doesn't tire my eyes. It's wonderful to be able to read books again, even if it's on an e-reader; thanks to its portability and storage, I can take hundreds of books with me whenever I travel (same with my Dad). I really do love it.
I can honestly say that I like e-readers now; does it really matter if we read a book on paper or on a screen? Provided that people are reading, whatever method they choose to read should be irrelevant. My only regret is that I wish I had used my e-reader much earlier.
In the past year, my stance slowly softened; then, a few months ago, my Dad starting using an e-reader and loved it: it gave him the opportunity to read books more frequently again (many of our actual books are still packed away). Mum liked Dad's e-reader and she received one for her birthday. This encouraged me to take a new look at my e-reader.
I haven't been using it long, but I have to say that I do love my e-reader: I, too, can read books more often again and I like how the device's screen doesn't tire my eyes. It's wonderful to be able to read books again, even if it's on an e-reader; thanks to its portability and storage, I can take hundreds of books with me whenever I travel (same with my Dad). I really do love it.
I can honestly say that I like e-readers now; does it really matter if we read a book on paper or on a screen? Provided that people are reading, whatever method they choose to read should be irrelevant. My only regret is that I wish I had used my e-reader much earlier.
Thursday, 18 July 2013
The customer on a phone
Around two weeks ago, a checkout worker at a Sainsbury's (one of the UK's largest supermarket companies) denied service to a customer until said customer ended her phone call:
Sainsbury's apologised to the customer, who has since said that she will shop at a rival supermarket from now on; Sainsbury's itself welcomes debate over the issue. I agree with the checkout worker and I don't think that Sainsbury's should have apologised: the shopper was the one in the wrong in this situation.
There are several reasons why I think this: for one, there is no reason to be talking on a phone in a supermarket unless you're asking someone if there are any groceries that you need to pick up. Secondly, a shopper on the phone at the checkout delays the queue. Thirdly, it's pure rudeness: checkout workers are people, too, and there is no reason to ignore them; when you're paying for your shopping, the person operating the checkout should be your focus of attention, not somebody who is irrelevant to the situation.
The second article said that Sainsbury's are quietly supporting their employee. I hope that this is still the case: the checkout worker was justified in their actions, and phone usage at the checkout should be discouraged.
What do you think?
Sainsbury's apologised to the customer, who has since said that she will shop at a rival supermarket from now on; Sainsbury's itself welcomes debate over the issue. I agree with the checkout worker and I don't think that Sainsbury's should have apologised: the shopper was the one in the wrong in this situation.
There are several reasons why I think this: for one, there is no reason to be talking on a phone in a supermarket unless you're asking someone if there are any groceries that you need to pick up. Secondly, a shopper on the phone at the checkout delays the queue. Thirdly, it's pure rudeness: checkout workers are people, too, and there is no reason to ignore them; when you're paying for your shopping, the person operating the checkout should be your focus of attention, not somebody who is irrelevant to the situation.
The second article said that Sainsbury's are quietly supporting their employee. I hope that this is still the case: the checkout worker was justified in their actions, and phone usage at the checkout should be discouraged.
What do you think?
Wednesday, 17 July 2013
The heat
While I am pleased about the summer weather, especially after the extended winter, the current high temperatures do bother me. Well, perhaps not so much the heat itself as how we can deal with it: the vast majority of houses in the United Kingdom do not have air conditioning; additionally, most of them are not fitted with any window screens, either. The latter is especially annoying because I have to keep my windows closed most of them time as to not let in insects and spiders, of which I've already had to evict several.
I don't want the winter weather to return just yet, of course...it's summer, after all; for now, more breezes like the ones that were present this evening would be welcome; the day itself was a scorcher, but the evening was cool and pleasant because of the breezes.
I don't want the winter weather to return just yet, of course...it's summer, after all; for now, more breezes like the ones that were present this evening would be welcome; the day itself was a scorcher, but the evening was cool and pleasant because of the breezes.
Tuesday, 16 July 2013
The hot air balloons
On Sunday evening, there were a few hot air balloons flying over our neighbourhood and landing in a nearby field; both my camera and my phone were both on charge but my brother's camera was available and he took this photograph:
It's a red balloon; there was also a blue balloon flying over but by the time by brother had his camera that particular balloon was already out of sight. Then, last evening:
My brother photographed this blue, purple and white balloon, this time using my camera.
It's a red balloon; there was also a blue balloon flying over but by the time by brother had his camera that particular balloon was already out of sight. Then, last evening:
My brother photographed this blue, purple and white balloon, this time using my camera.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



